XHTML & Schemas
paul at prescod.net
Thu Sep 2 22:37:51 BST 1999
David Megginson wrote:
> > I don't know what you are talking about. A schema rule is inherently
> > triggered based on hooks within the document. What could be a more
> > natural hook than the universal name for an element type?
> Perhaps I misremembered the original excerpt -- I thought that it had
> to do with the Namespace URI pointing to the schema.
Maybe I misunderstood it. Whatever.
> I agree that
> schemas should define rules for qualified names.
Do you agree that it will be vital to be able to declare whether an
element was meant to validate against the "strict" or "loose" schema (if
indeed there are both)?
If so, do you further agree that that information should be expressed in
a namespace? What other mechanism could we use to know whether to apply
the loose:P content model or the strict:P model?
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev