an unfilled need [ tie XML to Java ]

[Len Bullard]

Steven Livingstone wrote:
> 
> >Yes, tie XML to Java
> 
> [ I have come into this discussion a bit late - where does this comment
> originate? ]
> 
> This statement seems to defeat the one of the purposes of XML. I am not (not
> would want to) learn and use Java - for Web Applications there is no need
> for having to use Java. I have done plenty of exciting XML-based work using
> COM and scripting.

Tie XML to Java in an application.  That means one knows what is XML 
and what is application.  If that works for the designer, it provides 
both portable data and an interoperable application within the virtual 
machine.  If you have used COM to do that, you have tied your data 
to a COM-aware application.  Works for me.  Now, after one does 
that, what is still interoperable?  

len



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)