ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)

[Paul Prescod]

roddey at us.ibm.com wrote:
> 
> >Adding three lines of code introduces the opportunity for three times
> >the bugs in a real application? I don't buy it. Looking for "HTML 4.0
> >strict" OR "HTML 4.0 frameset" is no harder than looking for "UL" OR
> >"OL", if the software is set up right.

> I think its more complex than that. Its more than adding 3 lines of code. What
> if you want to validate the XHTML? 

I can validate all three variants of XHTML using parsers that are three
years old already!!!! Download the DTD, download nsgmls or IE5 and try
it yourself!

 Paul Prescod



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)