CNET on XHTML

[Don Park]

The article was updated with Ann's comment added so it is more balanced now
although the result is the same: there is trouble brewing for W3C.  Since I
am fairly certain that W3C will ignore all the arguments and concerns raised
against three namespaces, I believe the divide between W3C and XML-DEV will
continue to widen.

I wonder why the SOAP spec was submitted to IETF rather than W3C?  A new
trend of sort?

Don Park    -   mailto:donpark at docuverse.com
Docuverse   -   http://www.docuverse.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)