Another look at namespaces
simonstl at simonstl.com
Thu Sep 16 18:59:25 BST 1999
At 12:44 PM 9/16/99 -0400, Ann Navarro wrote:
>At 09:16 AM 9/16/99 -0700, Walter Underwood wrote:
>>At 04:41 PM 9/15/99 -0400, Tim Berners-Lee wrote:
>>> [...] the HTML 4.0 spec defined three, and XHTML was required to be
>>>as direct a mapping from HTML 4.0 to XML as possible.
>>This is a rationale. Including this with the recent draft
>>would have saved us all a lot of e-mail traffic.
>This was said way back at the beginning (August 29)
>Quoting myself "No, we've not confused them. We happen to have three
>'flavors' of XHTML 1.0
>(the first deliverable from the XHTML project, not the end sum of our
>work), that essentially map to the three flavors of HTML 4.0."
>But apparently nobody wanted to hear it.
Actually, I think what was missing was the rationale for:
Three flavors of XHTML -> Three namespaces for XHTML
I don't think anyone's argued hard that three flavors of DTDs was a
horrible thing, though I know many of us (including, perhaps even Ann)
would just as soon reduce it to one.
XML: A Primer (2nd Ed - September)
Building XML Applications
Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical
Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev