Attributes vs. text content

[John Tigue]

joubin at inch.com wrote:
|   Consider:
|   
|   <?xml version="1.0"?>
|   <methodCall type="asynchronous">
|      <methodName>xmlbased.cgi.named.foo<methodName>
|        // .. etc.
|   </methodCall>
|   
|     v.s.
|   
|   <?xml version="1.0"?>
|   <methodCall>
|      </asynchronous>
|      <methodName>xmlbased.cgi.named.foo<methodName>
|        // .. etc.
|   </methodCall>


Wouldn't that be:

<?xml?>
  <?version?>1.0<?/version?>

<methodCall>
   </asynchronous>
   <methodName>xmlbased.cgi.named.foo<methodName>
     // .. etc.
</methodCall>


or are pseudo-attibutes ok?


/John

--
John Tigue
john.tigue at tigue.com
http://www.tigue.com



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)