Attributes vs. text content
joubin
joubin at inch.com
Tue Sep 21 22:29:59 BST 1999
Right you are. Nasty looking thing, isn't it?
>Wouldn't that be:
>
><?xml?>
> <?version?>1.0<?/version?>
>
><methodCall>
> </asynchronous>
> <methodName>xmlbased.cgi.named.foo<methodName>
> // .. etc.
></methodCall>
>
>
>or are pseudo-attibutes ok?
>
>
>/John
>
>--
>John Tigue
>john.tigue at tigue.com
>http://www.tigue.com
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev
mailing list