Grooves: why are "data" designed as properties and not nodes ?

[Ken MacLeod]

"Anders W. Tell" <anderst at toolsmiths.se> writes:

> Thanks for the clarifications, I think Im getting a feel for how
> groves works.
> 
> However my initial question remains, why are "data" located in
> properties and not nodes.
> 
> If actual "data" where to be moved into Nodes the Grove model would
> still be well defined and maybe even simpler to understand and work
> with.

I'm not seeing what you're seeing.  I don't see how a property is
somehow seperate from the node that carries it, i.e. you retrieve data
by accessing a field (property) of the node.  Properties don't exist
seperately from their node (the _values_ can be retrieved and used
seperately).

-- 
  Ken MacLeod
  ken at bitsko.slc.ut.us

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)