SAX2: Which license?
david-b at pacbell.net
Mon Jan 10 21:20:42 GMT 2000
Tim Bray wrote:
> ... The real problem we'd like to solve is, we'd
> like to try to prevent anyone who makes incompatible changes from still
> claiming it to be "SAX" and using the org.xml.sax package name. Right?
> Is there anything in the way of licensing, trademark, or copyright
> machinery that would be helpful? -Tim
Certainly. The question is then who pays the lawyers to enforce
those claims. Classically it's the copyright/trademark owner,
since nobody else has legal standing. Public domain items have
no such owner.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev