XML for 3D geometry and objects

[Charlie Kaiman]

Could someone enlighten us -- or at least me -- on VML/SVG and what is *so*
revolutionary about them?  I seen some amazing things done with VRML, but
the VML demos (that I've seen) just don't compare?  Is there a difference?

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xml-dev at ic.ac.uk [mailto:owner-xml-dev at ic.ac.uk]On Behalf Of
Brandt Dainow
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2000 8:17 AM
To: xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Subject: RE: XML for 3D geometry and objects


Maybe - Microsoft have standardized on (and deployed in Office2000) VML.  So
now we have VML versus SVG.  SVG won't revolutionise anything while 90% of
application users are running VML.

I'm not qualified to take sides, but I don't think we need both.

Brandt Dainow
bd at internet-etc.com
Internet Etc Ltd
http://www.internet-etc.com

Brandt Dainow
bd at internet-etc.com
Internet Etc Ltd
http://www.internet-etc.com

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom at ic.ac.uk the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email at your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.