Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)
cbullard at hiwaay.net
Sat Jan 22 18:55:55 GMT 2000
Tim Bray wrote:
> That's only if you think that IE5 counts as an XML browser, realistically.
> I don't. -Tim
Sad, because in the near to mid term, the dominant implementations will
effectively define XML than XML1.0. So, vote with your feet if you
must, but choose to lose.
OTOH, those non-browser web apps which use XML might also vote with
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom at ic.ac.uk the message
unsubscribe xml-dev (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email at your-subscribed-address
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
More information about the Xml-dev