Clearer W3C Specs (was Re: XML Information Set is seeding impenetrable language; reconsider?)

[Thomas B. Passin]

Thanks, Henry and Tim, for responding to my post.  I'm very happy to hear
about this advance.

Tom Passin

Henry S. Thompson  wrote:

> "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin at idsonline.com> writes:
>
> > <snip/>
> >
> > The IETF won't bless an RFC until there are two independent
implementations.
> > I think this is the right kind of approach.  Surely, Tim B's Lark
> > implementation must have been a great help to the XML committee (I'm
> > guessing, I don't really know anything about its role).  There's nothing
> > like trying to build to a spec to uncover its lack of clarity.
>
> The W3C has recently introduced a status of Candidate Recommendation
> which we expect most RECs to pass through, which is specifically
> designed for implementation feedback.  XML Schema is certainly
> intending to take advantage of this.
>



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom at ic.ac.uk the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email at your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.