XLF: Legacy Log Problems

[Steven Champeon]

On Thu, 9 Jul 1998, John Cowan wrote:
> > Are you assuming that the XML parser should be able to analyze the
> > logfiles and produce reports on them as well? Seems like a lot to
> > ask of a parser...
> 
> No, I simply meant that such an application shouldn't have to
> parse PCDATA content to make very ordinary and reasonable
> discriminations.  PCDATA should be reserved for text strings
> meaningful only to human beings.  We already have to have an
> XML parser in every XLF analyzer, that's a given.  But there
> shouldn't have to be any other kind of parser too.
> 
> IMHO.

OK, that makes sense. We share HOs.
 
> Let 'em use on-the-fly gzipping and gunzipping, then.  Layering
> that over a generator or a parser is very easy.

Fair enough, provided it doesn't place undue load on an already
stressed environment. 

--
"All the good geek things,  |          schampeo at hesketh.com
 only without all the       |     http://a.jaundicedeye.com
 bad geek things."          |  http://hesketh.com/schampeo/



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)