SGML, XML and SML
donpark at docuverse.com
Sun Nov 21 05:02:42 GMT 1999
>If something is XML, it handles all valid XML
>Or it doesn't, and it isn't.
>If SML cannot support all XML constructs, it
>isn't XML. In the same way that XML is not SGML.
We never said SML is XML. SML is a subset of XML.
Specifically, it meets the production rule of the
external parsed entity minus CDATA section, PI, and
You are right that SML is not XML in the same sense
that XML is not SGML. That reasoning only justifies
a distinguishable name away from XML.
Don Park - mailto:donpark at docuverse.com
Docuverse - http://www.docuverse.com
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev