XHTML & Schemas

[David Megginson]

Paul Prescod writes:

 > I disagree on two fronts. First, namespaces are for distinguishing
 > element/attribute vocabularies *across* instances. The whole point is
 > that I could (one day) take some XHTML content and put it in an instance
 > that is not entirely an XHTML document.

Paul and I agree on this point.

 > > A corollary to this is that *something else* (perhaps in
 > > conjunction with namespaces) must trigger stylesheets,
 > > validators, etc. I would like to see a solution proposed for
 > > that---soon, if at all possible.
 > 
 > I don't follow this at all. What is the value in namespaces if they
 > cannot be used in style rules, schema rules and other such
 > name-triggered processes.

Agreed, again.  This is what you can do with Namespaces *now*, and I
think that it will end up being over 95% of what people what people do 
with Namespaces once there are specs for XML-Schemas, etc.  It is an
incredibly powerful idea, once we get our minds around it.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david at megginson.com
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)