Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)

Tim Bray tbray at
Mon Jan 24 06:22:09 GMT 2000

At 09:40 PM 1/23/00 -0600, Len Bullard wrote:
>So is DOM really required for XML 1.0, or is that a political position 
>about implementations?

There is no *point* to supporting XML in the browser if you don't
support the DOM.  If all you want is to display nice-looking stuff
to humans, HTML does an excellent job of that. -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at
Archived as: or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom at the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email at your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

More information about the Xml-dev mailing list